			<rss version="2.0">
				<channel>
					<title>Newsique / Tags / Justices</title>
					<language>en-us</language>
					<link>http://www.newsique.com/tags/politics/justices/</link>
					<description>Get Informed. Choose Your News.</description>
								<item>
				<title>Increasing justices', federal judges' pay a tough sell</title>
				<link>http://www.newsique.com/politics/increasing_justices_federal_judg/</link>
				<description>If there is one thing Supreme Court justices -- and perhaps every federal judge -- will agree on, it is that they are not being paid enough.

The subject of judicial salaries has been a lonely cause for years among the 875 or so members of the U.S. benc</description>
				<type>news</type>
				<category>politics</category>
				<pubDate>2007-07-07 00:15:19</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newsique.com/politics/increasing_justices_federal_judg/</guid>
				<source>
					<name>CNN</name>
					<link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/06/judges.pay/index.html</link>
													<more_info>http://www.newsique.com/sources/cnn/</more_info>
								<credibility>94</credibility>
											</source>
				<rating>
					<rating>Interesting [7]</rating>
													<credibility>80</credibility>
											</rating>
				<submitter>
					<username>neoform</username>
					<link>http://www.newsique.com/profiles/neoform/</link>
				</submitter>
				<comments>
					<count>0</count>
					<link>http://www.newsique.com/politics/increasing_justices_federal_judg/#comments</link>
				</comments>
			</item>
					<item>
				<title>Justices take potshots in opinions</title>
				<link>http://www.newsique.com/politics/justices_take_potshots_in_opinio/</link>
				<description>One Supreme Court justice says his fellow conservatives are &quot;too dismissive&quot; of government efforts to ensure racial diversity in schools. Another more liberal member says those on the right did &quot;serious violence&quot; to a high school student's free speech rig</description>
				<type>news</type>
				<category>politics</category>
				<pubDate>2007-07-07 00:15:19</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newsique.com/politics/justices_take_potshots_in_opinio/</guid>
				<source>
					<name>CNN</name>
					<link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/06/court.harsh/index.html</link>
													<more_info>http://www.newsique.com/sources/cnn/</more_info>
								<credibility>94</credibility>
											</source>
				<rating>
					<rating>Under Rated [1]</rating>
									</rating>
				<submitter>
					<username>neoform</username>
					<link>http://www.newsique.com/profiles/neoform/</link>
				</submitter>
				<comments>
					<count>0</count>
					<link>http://www.newsique.com/politics/justices_take_potshots_in_opinio/#comments</link>
				</comments>
			</item>
					<item>
				<title>Roberts steers court right back to Reagan</title>
				<link>http://www.newsique.com/politics/roberts_steers_court_right_back_/</link>
				<description>In a remarkable first full term of the remade Supreme Court, a narrow majority of justices changed the law on race, abortion, free speech and a swath of other issues affecting American life.

Long-standing precedents were discarded or reinterpreted. Gov</description>
				<type>news</type>
				<category>politics</category>
				<pubDate>2007-06-29 08:20:15</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newsique.com/politics/roberts_steers_court_right_back_/</guid>
				<source>
					<name>USA Today</name>
					<link>http://rssfeeds.usatoday.com/~r/usatoday-NewsTopStories/~3/128932297/2007-06-28-supreme-court-right_N.htm</link>
													<more_info>http://www.newsique.com/sources/usatoday/</more_info>
								<credibility>91</credibility>
											</source>
				<rating>
					<rating>Under Rated [1]</rating>
									</rating>
				<submitter>
					<username>neoform</username>
					<link>http://www.newsique.com/profiles/neoform/</link>
				</submitter>
				<comments>
					<count>0</count>
					<link>http://www.newsique.com/politics/roberts_steers_court_right_back_/#comments</link>
				</comments>
			</item>
					<item>
				<title>Will the Supreme Court Separate &quot;Drug Speech&quot; from Free Speech?</title>
				<link>http://www.newsique.com/politics/will_the_supreme_court_separate_/</link>
				<description>Justices in the Supreme Court's &quot;Bong Hits 4 Jesus&quot; case appear to be interested in turning &quot;Just Say No&quot; into &quot;Don't Even Say It,&quot; curtailing free speech rights.

On Monday, March 19, the Supreme Court heard a case concerning the scope of student speec</description>
				<type>opinion</type>
				<category>politics</category>
				<pubDate>2007-03-23 13:27:03</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.newsique.com/politics/will_the_supreme_court_separate_/</guid>
				<source>
					<name>Alter Net</name>
					<link>http://www.alternet.org/rights/49635/</link>
													<more_info>http://www.newsique.com/sources/alternet/</more_info>
								<credibility>86</credibility>
											</source>
				<rating>
					<rating>Under Rated [1]</rating>
									</rating>
				<submitter>
					<username>neoform</username>
					<link>http://www.newsique.com/profiles/neoform/</link>
				</submitter>
				<comments>
					<count>0</count>
					<link>http://www.newsique.com/politics/will_the_supreme_court_separate_/#comments</link>
				</comments>
			</item>
						</channel>
			</rss>
		