Ksadya / Comments |
|
|
Comments
if ya aint sposta eat egg, stay away from the egg rolls. If you're otherwise healthy, indulge every once in a while.
Reference: Study: Chinese Restaurant Food Is Unhealthy
Maybe they should have used a robots.txt file. Liability should be their fault. It doesn't take long before any search engine indexes any popular page online.
and 100% of me thinks it was a show put on to distract us while something more sinister was going on at the white house.
404 article not found
Usually, the argument here is that simple steps such as block-words/phrases be instituted. But words are exactly that, words, not content. Determining what is legal and illegal based on how somebody words a file is:
Useless - hax0r = hacker, M0v13 t1tl3 = Movie title, etc. Google is an expert at interpreting such substitutions.
Unfair - I hate "I *heart* Huckabees" could be a legal video, critiquing a legitimate movie. Block-words would fail to recognize that it's a movie review.
Censorship - I *heart* this, that, and everything else. Who's to say I don't heart my friend Huckabees?
Another simple feedback mechanism is "Do you feel that this video is being distributed illegally (yes/no)" Obviously, malicious users could easily click yes to everything. Digg's popularity has attracted numerous bots. There is a black market for falsely tagging web content. If I have a car wash, and somebody's filming a personal video in front of my car wash, I could set these bots to vote the video as being illegally distributed, even though the video was made under the conditions of fair use.
Simple mechanisms are never simple. If you think it's so simple, do it yourself.
-- Full time programmer
Reference: The case against YouTube
We spend a billion a day out there and the UN can't find 1.7 million to feed these people? What gives? Who's pocketing it?
Reference: U.N. Seeks $1.7M to Feed Iraqi Refugees
|